Comparison between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Evaluating the Quality of Life at Different Spatial Levels

Achieving a good urban form has been problem since the formation of earliest cities. The tendency human populations toward living in environments and urbanization made quality life more prominent. This article aimed to calculate an objective way. For this purpose, technique for order preferences by similarity ideal solution (TOPSIS), vlseKriterijumsk optimizacija kompromisno resenje (VIKOR), simple additive weighted (SAW), elimination choice expressing reality (ELECTRE) have utilized. Quality was assessed at three spatial levels. In regard, socioeconomic, environmental, accessibility dimensions were considered. As result, first level comparison, sub-districts District 6 ranked higher than that 13. On second level, 6, vicinity had rankings center, 13, near center city rankings. third life. results comparison between research methods showed SAW method performs better terms stability. Based on correlation tables, there strong direct relationship each pair addition, as study area became smaller, increased.